News, introspective, insight & opinion from around the NFL & NCAA

News, introspective, insight & opinion from around the NFL & NCAA

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Richard Seymour is doing his best George Costanza......

Anyone else following this Richard Seymour saga? You just can’t make this stuff up! This situation is now is beyond bizarre.

At issue here is the fact that there has to be some type of mechanism in place to compel players who aren't happy with the fact that they've been traded to continue to honor the contracts they previously have signed. Otherwise, every player would have a de facto no-trade clause in his contract, allowing him to dig in his heels and refuse to move at no consequence, or possibly to show up for work -- George Costanza style -- at a place where he no longer is employed. How great would it be if he just showed up to work Sunday morning for the Patriots game. :)

On September 6, 2009 the Patriots traded the eight-year veteran defensive lineman Richard Seymour to the Oakland Raiders in exchange for a first-round draft choice in the 2011 NFL draft. In his eight years with the Patriots, Seymour played an important part in delivering six division championships, four conference titles and three Super Bowl championships to New England.

But Seymour doesn’t want to go…….

Why not you ask? We’ll I guess it’s because he feels they suck is the answer, and it seems that some others agree with Seymour……….On the Dan Patrick show the other day, Rodney Harrison, his old teammate, was asked about his thoughts on the Seymour trade. His answer - “If I had been traded to the Raiders, I would drive to Chicago in order to climb the Sears Tower and jump off!”

Ok, so Seymour doesn’t report to the Raiders and the Raiders send him a “5-day letter” - a letter telling him he had five days to report or be placed a suspended list which would allow the Raiders to retain his rights in 2010 for his 2009 salary of $3.7 million.

Now Mike Reiss of the Boston Globe reports that the NFL Players Union has filed a grievance contending that the Raiders lack the ability to threaten Seymour with placement on the reserve/left club list. The argument will be that the procedure does not apply to players who have been traded.

It remains to be seen whether the union proposes a different procedure, or whether the union believes that the team that is trying to trade the player has the ability to send the "five-day letter."

How ever this turns out, you can be sure that this will forever be known as the “Seymour rule.” How come my clients never get involved in this juicy stuff? – Keith A. Baker 
Keith A. Baker is a sports agent in Stamford, Connecticut. His goal is to offer a unique insight to the world of sports. Comments in his columns are for entertainment purposes only and do not reflect the views and opinions of his firm or his clients.
----------

Have a Fantasy Football or Rotisserie baseball question? Want to know who to pick up, who to activate and who the hot prospects are? Ask Dr. Roto. Let Dr. Roto guide your team to a league championship.
BallHype: hype it up! FantasySportsBlips: vote it up! Top Blogs TheSports100.com | Sports Toplist Add to Technorati Favorites

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Show Your Support

Please Show Your Support
If you like what you read, please cast a vote at one or more of these sites to help our distribution.
Click Home for all Blog posts or search BLOG ARCHIVES in the Right Sidebar for more Blogs